Enough of Us

childfree childless without kids

  • Home
  • About the Book
  • Contact
  • About the Authors

True or False: Population Growth is Necessary for a Healthy Economy

November 15, 2013 By Ellis and Cheryl Levinson

Let’s answer the title question this way: If population growth is necessary for a prosperous economy, we will one day prosper ourselves into oblivion. If we must grow in order to prosper, we will either have keep populating until we all stand shoulder-to-shoulder, or decide to regress back to a less-wealthy state.

          As to whether we need population growth, let’s consider the broader picture. Automation is eliminating the need for workers. Technology improves worker productivity. We live in a society in which production is becoming more efficient. Costco, Amazon, Lowe’s, and the like are turning warehouses into stores. So while corporate profits and stock markets hit new highs, engineers are forced to drive school buses and work at Wal-Mart at the same time the Federal Reserve Bank buttresses a lagging economy. It sounds like an economy run by the Mad Hatter.

          All of these apparently contradictory indicators lead us to believe that we don’t have enough jobs to keep a growing population employed. Sooner or later, it seems, those corporate profits will sink away as we have an ever-growing segment of people struggling to pay their bills.

          But, hey, we’re not economists. In lieu of that status let’s look at a study from Population Connection (PC) that aims to refute the allegations of those it describes as “questionable characters” who are trying to “guilt American women into having more children.”

Population Connection logo          The organization asserts that while Americans will have to make some adjustments as baby boomers age, we can definitely have a healthy economy without increasing our population.  “Economic growth does not depend on population growth.”

          According to Population Connection President John Seager, researchers he describes as independent interviewed scores of economists and academics in related fields. The researchers concluded that economic growth is not dependent upon population growth. Considering the world’s limited resources it is a bad idea to rely on a growing workforce to compensate for an aging population. “Increasing productivity, boosting female participation in the labor force, and providing incentives for older workers to stay on the job longer if they want to, can offset the effects of an older population.

          “U.S. productivity can increase with a smaller workforce, but not unless we invest in education and address age discrimination.”

          Among the insights provided by the academics are:

  • Gross Domestic Product measures monetary value. It does not include leisure, volunteering, family time, and other productive activities.
  • Natural resources are limited. Humans are consuming renewable natural resources faster than the earth can replace them,
  • There is a culture in society of “education-work-retire,” which needs to be re-imagined. We need to adopt the concept of continuously educating ourselves, making us more adaptable.
  • Older workers should be open to—and should be accepted as—being able to do work that typically had not been thought of as suitable after “typical” retirement age.

          Seager makes the case that, “Unfortunately, in today’s media environment, panicking over ‘birth dearths’ and other ‘baby busts’ always seems to get more airtime. The message ‘We’re gonna (sic) be just fine,’ isn’t sexy so it doesn’t sell.”

          With so many environmental, quality-of-life, civil strife, and threatened species problems to be concerned with, all of which are exacerbated by mushrooming human population, “It’s nice to have at least one thing—too few babies—that we don’t have to worry about,” explains Seager.

          You can read the entire report upon which Seager bases his case right here.

          Our book makes the case that there are enough of us. The truth be told, there are more than Enough of Us.  And with fewer of us, our economy and planet can thrive. Hence, the answer to our question is a resounding, “False.”

 

 

Buy the Book

Enough of Us by Cheryl and Ellis Levinson

Click to Buy and to read a free chapter

BUY THE BOOK

Follow Us!

Follow Us on http://pinterest.com LinkedInFollow Us on http://pinterest.com TwitterFollow Us on http://pinterest.com FacebookFollow Us on http://pinterest.com WordpressFollow Us on http://pinterest.com Pinterest

Hear Us Talk About the Book – Philadelphia’s Rich Zeoli Show, WPHT

Rich Zeoli-WPHT-Enough of us 

Recent Posts

  • Fire Sale on Remaining Inventory of Our “Enough Of Us” Book!
  • Eyes Wide Shut When it Comes to Procreation
  • Sobering Statistics on Chronic Depression
  • Air Pollution Kills Two Million People per Year
  • India has Enough Money to Wipe out its Poverty. So why Doesn’t It?

Categories

  • Adoption
  • Aging Population
  • blog
  • Childfree living
  • Contraception
  • Environment/ecology
  • Environmental Impacts
  • Hazards of Having Children
  • Human reproduction
  • Human Sustainability
  • Illness
  • Life's Pitfalls
  • Our Book
  • Overpopulation
  • Religion
  • Sadness
  • Selfish Behavior
  • Social Fairness
  • Uncategorized

Blogroll

  • The Consumer Guy web site
Copyright © 2021 · Enough of Us·Site by Askmepc-Webdesign ·